Special Area of Interest
The transformation of scholarly communication systems and
processes is a topic of increasing urgency in academia today.
Many tensions within the research community derive from
this need for transformation, its challenges, and its
opportunities. I define scholarly communication systems in
a broad sense, to include all of the technical means, economic
interactions and cultural phenomena by which knowledge is
exchanged in scholarly circles. This definition encompasses
a wide variety of phenomena, from scholarly print
publications to information retrieved and disseminated via global
hypertext networks.
The transformation of scholarly communication systems has been
driven through history by the interaction of technological and
cultural innovations. The printing press was a key
technological breakthrough in the history of scholarly discourse.
This technology was refined over the years through such
cultural innovations as the development of the modern university
structure, publication of monographs, journals, proceedings, and
other conventions of format. Subsequent breakthroughs in
information technology such as film, phonographs, and computers
have each contributed to further revolutions in scholarly
communication systems which build and interact in rich and
complex ways.
A strong perception has arisen that we now face a crisis in
scholarly communication. This crisis is a result of many
cultural, economic, and technological factors. Escalating
costs of scholarly information have resulted in enormous fiscal
difficulties for universities and libraries. The practice of
promotion and tenure has resulted in a proliferation of scholarly
literature dominated by prestigious academic publishing firms who
can command inordinately high prices for their products. At
the same time university and library budgets are in most cases
static or shrinking. The development of intellectual
property rights has not kept pace with technological changes and
trends in the academic publishing industry, and poses vexing
dilemmas for the scholarly community. A confusion of
emerging technologies offer expensive potential solutions.
There is great need for theoretical analysis that can lead to
resolutions of the tensions in current scholarly communication
systems and guide decision making. Such an analysis would
contribute to and build on the dialogue among the many
significant groups of stakeholders now concerned with these
issues (examples include the Association of Research Libraries,
the Association of American Universities, the Association of
American Publishers, the Mellon Foundation, and others).
This conceptual framework would include a categorization of
the successful and unsuccessful patterns in adapting new
technologies and cultural approaches to communication in
scholarship. It would provide insight into how we can most
effectively make use of the opportunities presented by changing
information technology in the scholarly communication process,
and how to understand the cultural effects such changes will have
on us.